Cyprus: The Crans-Montana Deadlock and the Next Steps

download

By Van Coufoudakis

Over the summer, Cyprus was back in the news. The UN mediator Espen Barth
Eide, assisted by American and British diplomats, worked overtime to convince the
international community that the “parties” in the Cyprus talks were close to a “strategic
agreement” resolving this long standing international problem. The term “strategic
agreement” appears to have replaced the term “comprehensive settlement” used in the
past. The change in terminology does not change the reality either of the aims or of the
anticipated outcome of the UN sponsored talks on Cyprus. Eide’s optimistic account was
supplemented by warnings to the “parties” that failure to reach a comprehensive
settlement would mean the end of the road for the reunification of Cyprus. These
warnings had reminders of the final stages of the negotiations that led to the failed Annan Plan in 2004.

Read more

This entry was posted in Annan Plan, Bi-Zonal Bi-Communal Federation, Cyprus Problem History, Occupied Cyprus, Turkish Invasion of Cyprus. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s